Environmental Documentaries / Using Movie maker
Christian Auclair
|
|
Excellent (45-50) |
Good (40-44) |
Fair (34-39) |
Needs Revision (X<33) |
TOTAL |
|
Content |
Topic is presented with depth, clarity and purpose throughout the entire presentation. |
Topic is presented with depth, clarity and purpose for most of the presentation. |
There are a few lapses in focus, and the topic is lacking depth, though general ideas are clear. |
It is difficult to figure out the purpose of this presentation. |
|
|
|
Excellent (23-25) |
Good (20-22) |
Fair (17-19) |
Needs Revision (X<16) |
|
|
Audio Content |
Narrative is well-read with appropriate inflections, pitch and pauses throughout. -Recording is very clear |
Narrative is well-read with appropriate inflections, pitch and pauses for most of the presentation -Recording is clear |
Narrative is well-read with occasional use of inflections, pitch and pauses. -Recording is generally clear |
Narrative is very monotone OR absent. Sound levels not always clear |
|
|
Visuals |
-Images are highly relevant, and consistent with what is being said in the narrative at all times. -Nice use of transitions -text utilized to highlight ideas or key points throughout the video |
-Images are relevant, and consistent with what is being said in the narrative most of the time -either text or transitions used at some points to emphasize key ideas. |
Images are relevant and consistent with what is being said in general, though more effort could have been made at certain obvious points. |
Images are not always relevant, are of poor quality, are too few in number, or detract from the overall quality of the presentation. |
|
|
TOTAL X/100 |
|
||||